Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
  • Expand Your Mind
  • Contact

Pretentious Presents

12/19/2015

3 Comments

 
Picture
by David Hagenbuch, Founder of Mindful Marketing
What if Bill Gates were your brother, Warren Buffet were your grandfather, or Mark Zuckerberg were your friend--What would you give them for a gift this holiday season?  Billionaires are notoriously difficult to buy for, but fortunately there’s help . . .
 
Bloomburg Business has come out with “The Billionaire’s Shopping Guide: 13 Gifts for the Person Who Can Buy Anything.”  As the title suggests, this gift-giving resource is aimed at helping the friends and family of the ultra-rich pick the perfect present for that person who already owns almost everything he/she needs or wants.  You can read the full list with the complete descriptions, but here’s a summary:
 
  • A Meal at Every Three Michelin Star Restaurant:  $274, 983
  • A 1962 Aston Martin DB4/GT:  $15, 000,000 - $17,000,000
  • The First Omega Speedmaster Watch:  $100,000 - $150,000
  • Original Art from 'Where the Wild Things Are:  $200,000 - $950,000
  • Rodin’s 'Eternel Printemps':  $489,000 - $597,000
  • Hang Out at the Edge of Space:  $90,000
  • A 1978 Luke Skywalker Action Figure: $12,000 - $18,000
  • A Hand-Painted Dress by Holly Fowler: price upon request
  • Marc Newson 'Extruded Table 3':  $100,000 - $150,000
  • A Wine Château in Saint-Émilion:  $5,190,424
  • Chalcedony Bracelets Owned by the Duchess of Windsor:  $400,000 - $600,000
  • The Chance to Live Like a Spy for Two Months:  $11,300
  • A Trek Through Untouched Rivers and Mountains in Papua New Guinea:  $15,000
 
Although Bloomberg has compiled this list, it isn’t the one selling these items; rather they’re available through a variety of vendors, including Sotheby’s and Christies auction houses, and web-based businesses VeryFirstTo.com and TrulyExperiences.com.  Another of the suppliers is luxury retailer Neiman Marcus, which curates its own unique collection of “Fantasy Gifts” that can be found within the pages of its annual Christmas Book.  Here are a few of its 2015 Fantasy Gifts, which Neiman Marcus describes as “Eye-Popping, Jaw-Dropping Dreams Come True”:
  
  • Arch Motorcycle & Ride Experience:  $150,000
  • World View Exploration at the Edge of Space:  $90,000
  • Italy Tour with Ippolita & Artemest Craftsmen:  $150,000
  • Neiman Marcus Limited-Edition Mustang Convertible:  $95,000
  • Texas Guitar Trio Gift:  $30,000 each
  • Couture Diary: $10,000
  • His & Hers Ultimate Children’s Costumes in Mackenzie-Childs Trunks:  $5,000
  • 12-Day Dream Trip to India:  $400,000
 
Can such extraordinary purchases be justified?  Well, one way may be to look at them as investments.  For instance, cars generally depreciate in value, but perhaps a Limited Edition Mustang Convertible will appreciate if it’s not driven but rather is garage-kept in mint condition.  In that sense, buying a rare car or piece of original artwork is not unlike holding stocks with the hope of a favorable return on investment.
 
Most of the gifts listed above, however, aren’t items that will increase in value over time, and others aren’t physical assets at all; they’re intangible experiences.  Take the Ultimate Children’s Costumes in Mackenzie-Childs Trunks.  It would be cruel to buy a child that special costume she really wants, then tell her that she can’t put it on and play in it.  At the same time, if she does wear Cinderella’s Ball Gown and play with the custom trunk, is it possible for her to realize $5,000 worth of benefits before becoming bored with them or outgrowing the dress?  Probably not.  The same is also likely true of the 12-Day Dream Trip to India.  Speaking from firsthand experience, India is an incredible country that everyone should visit if they have the opportunity, but to drop almost a half million dollars on a less-than-two-week trip seems extravagant, to use an understatement.
 
There’s nothing inherently wrong with owing things or doing things.  We need certain material goods just to function in our world, and some experiences provide real physical, emotional, and other benefits.  Beyond such practical value, possessions can provide a “sense of self” as well as offer “stability and continuity in our lives” (Belk, 2011).  As we grow older and wiser, though, we realize that there’s a limit to these benefits and that consuming too much of even a good thing is wasteful (Chan & Tong, 2006).
 
But, maybe it’s different with gifts:  Don’t people appreciate expensive gifts more than less costly ones?  Not according to Flynn and Adam’s (2009) study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.  While this research revealed that gift-givers thought their more expensive gifts would be appreciated more, gift-recipients did not make the same association.  These finding are consistent with those of Richins (1994) who concluded that people ascribe value to possessions not based on their cost but on the meaning they provide.  In terms of gift-giving, therefore, maybe it really is the thought that counts.
 
Coming full circle, it’s interesting to note that Bloomberg Business, the curator of "The Billionaire’s Shopping Guide” outlined at the onset of this post, also recently ran a piece titled “Most billionaires can’t stay that rich after 20 years.”  A key statistics in the article is “of 289 billionaires in 1995, only 126 still have $1 billion.”  Having money now is no guarantee that one will have money in the future.  So, maybe even a billionaire would be better off with a gift that’s low on cost and high on sentimental value.
 
Do ultra-luxury retailers like Neiman Marcus create stakeholder value?  If they sell the extravagances they advertise, they undoubtedly make money, but as discussed above, it’s questionable whether their customers reap proportional benefits.  In fact, an even better question might be “At what point does one stop owning such expensive possessions and they start owning you?  Furthermore, as we become more aware of the negative impact that the overconsumption of a few has on the rest of our world, it becomes apparent that such extreme indulgence doesn’t represent good stewardship, rather it symbolizes “Mindless Marketing.”
​
Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
3 Comments
Jennifer Rusling link
1/23/2016 12:01:06 pm

In response to the “Mindless Marketing” conclusion of this “Pretentious Presents” blog post, I find myself agreeing with some points while disagreeing with others. To start off, I do agree that we are called to be good stewards of what we are given. Therefore, spending one’s money on $100,000 watches does seem over the top. At the same time, I do not believe it is completely “Mindless” for these extremely expensive items to be marketed. If one has the money, I do not believe it is wrong to have an option of spending it on something one might enjoy for oneself as well as buying it as a gift. As a society, we buy things that seemingly waste our money – cigarettes and lottery tickets, for example. Therefore, if one has the opportunity to purchase something that is somewhat constructive, although expensive, I do not believe it is mindless if one is thoughtful with their purchases. Lastly, I do agree with Flynn and Adam’s (2009) study as well as Richins (1994) study that concluded that receivers of gifts care more about the meaning and thought that come from a gift rather than the price tag. Therefore, the price of a gift does not compare with the time, energy, and thoughtfulness that was invested.

Reply
Tim Dunn
1/27/2016 12:56:26 pm

Overall I agree with this article. I have trouble believing that these purchases create equal value for the consumer and the seller, and many of these purchases are heavily in the favor of the seller. I wouldn't have as much of a problem with these items if the article did not present these as good ideas for "gifts". These gifts appear to be more for making a statement with a price tag rather than getting someone a thoughtful gift at a more modest price. There is nothing inherently wrong with expensive gifts, but at a certain point spending hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions for things like a watch or trip is being wasteful, and not equal value.

Reply
Eli
4/5/2016 12:45:37 am

The fact that a suggested shopping list for billionaires even exists seems to me to be pointless. They literally can buy anything that they want what could you even give them something that they can really enjoy. The fact that these gift are so ridiculously expensive makes me think that if someone actually followed this advice and purchased one of these things, they are not really buying something nice in order to bless the recipient but to they can flaunt how much money they have. On the other hand, if someone had the money to spend on extravagant and expensive items and experiences, why stop them. I am not bothered that they buy extravagant things because they worked hard to earn that money. Although, as Hagenbuch said there is a point to where you stop owning you material things and they start to own you. I believe this happens to everyone not just the rich.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2020
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly