Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Mindful Marketing Book
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
  • Contact

Why Did the PGA Stop Keeping Score with LIV?

6/20/2023

5 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch - professor of marketing at Messiah University -
​author of 
Honorable Influence - founder of Mindful Marketing 

“If you can’t beat them join them.”  This old adage, suggesting that adversaries become allies, has been used to describe everything from Vichy France aligning with Nazi Germany to Apollo Creed training Rocky Balboa.  Now a very surprising real-life sports pairing has made ethics appear expendable or at least raised the question:  Is it okay to have a moral change of mind?
 
The Professional Golfers’ Association’s (PGA) decision to merge with LIV Golf was a move that virtually no one expected.  Even professional golfers and analysts who cover the game were shocked by the news.  The PGA’s sudden change of heart, which went from viewing LIV as a bitter rival to a bedfellow also represented for many an epic moral capitulation.

Over the past year, the PGA and LIV have been “at war.”  The PGA had threatened to suspend golfers who defected to LIV and even ban them for life.  Why such acrimony?  Of course, no organization wants a new competitor, especially one that steals its product (golfers) and commandeers its place (golf venues).
 
However, the PGA’s disdain for LIV was rooted in more than competition-fueled conflict.  Many in the veteran golf association, as well as others, took issue with LIV’s funding source – the sovereign wealth fund of Saudi Arabia, the nation of origin for 15 of the 19 hijackers involved in the 9/11 attacks and a country known for human right abuses.
 
In an interview just a month ago, the PGA’s CEO, Seth Waugh, was heard “trashing” LIV Golf ahead of the PGA Championship.  How is such a seemingly irreconcilable relationship so suddenly  repaired?  One ESPN piece, “How the shocking PGA Tour-LIV Golf deal went down” details the events leading up to the proposed merger and its players, while another describes how the unification, which also includes the DP World Tour (Europe), might solidify the sport long-term.
 
This Mindful Marketing article doesn’t pretend to know what’s best for the future of professional golf; rather, it aims to ask a more general philosophical question:  Was it okay for the PGA to have a moral change of mind?  
 
Of course, it’s not organizations but the individuals that manage them who make decisions, including ethical ones.  Most of us have experienced that our initial inclinations are not always optimal.  As evidence, we’ve all mistakes and often realized later the option we should have selected.
 
Imperfect decision-making is a thread that has run continually through human history and often involved ethics.  For instance, decisions in favor of racial segregation in the U.S. in the 19th- and 20th century are ones that most Americans now reject, as are the choices that kept women from voting until 1920.
 
​
Picture
 
Realizing the error of one’s way and self-correcting a moral stance is a good thing.  However, it’s also important to help others understand the reason for the reversal.  Intelligent, inquiring people want to know not just that a judgment that was A is now B but why it’s changed  That’s where moral reasoning helps. 
 
In a moral argument, a person first identifies a moral standard then suggests one or more alleged facts, which lead to a conclusion, or moral judgment.  A month ago, it seemed that many PGA supporters/LIV detractors morally reasoned along the lines of the following:
  • Human rights should be upheld. (moral standard)
  • Saudi Arabia has not upheld certain human rights. (alleged fact 1)
  • LIV Golf’s funding come from the sovereign wealth fund of Saudi Arabia. (alleged fact 2)
  • LIV Golf’s funding source taints the league. (alleged fact 3)
  • It’s wrong for professional golfers to play for LIV. (moral judgment)
 
Then, without notice, the PGA reversed course, announcing its merger with LIV and thereby introducing a new moral judgement:  It’s fine for professional golfers to play for LIV.
 
Again, there’s nothing wrong with having a moral change of heart, especially if it’s the result of ethical enlightenment.  However, others deserve to know what changed the moral judgment, which is where the PGA fell short of the cup.
 
A year ago, PGA Tour Commissioner Jay Monahan was invoking the 9/11 terrorist attacks as a main reason to reject LIV.  Now, he will reportedly serve as CEO of the newly created company.
 
Monahan and the PGA have offered little evidence that their change of heart had anything to do with recognition of either a more compelling moral standard or more salient alleged facts such as, ‘Saudi Arabia’s record on human rights is improving’ or ‘Where money comes from doesn’t matter as much as what’s done with it.’
 
Moreover, it appears that the PGA has made a wholesale change in its moral decision-making from principle-based ethics, or nonconsequentialism, to outcome-based ethics, or consequentialism.  Evidence of this philosophical shift can be seen in recent statements from the PGA and Monahan that focus not on upholding specific moral principles but on prioritizing outcomes for the game of golf, for instance:
 
“We are pleased to move forward, in step with LIV and PIF’s world-class investing experience, and I applaud PIF Governor Yasir Al-Rumayyan for his vision and collaborative and forward-thinking approach that is not just a solution to the rift in our game, but also a commitment to taking it to new heights. This will engender a new era in global golf, for the better.”
 
Understandably, given what’s transpired, this explanation has failed to reach the green for many of the tour’s most important stakeholders.  Many top professional golfers, have felt blindsided by the decision and left to wonder what inspired it.  Rory McIlroy, the third ranked golfer in the world, said he was surprised by news of the merger, he felt like a “sacrificial lamb,” and he hated LIV and hoped it would go away.
 
Similarly, hall of fame golfer Tom Watson sent a letter to Monahan questioning the merger Watson also acknowledged that his skepticism about the new structure has been “compounded by the hypocrisy in disregarding the moral issue.”
 
If the merger goes through, professional golf, with its strong new financial backing and consolidation will likely thrive.  However, the PGA’s pivot has left a moral divot that will not be easily replaced.
 
It’s the prerogative of any person and professional sports association, to have a moral change of heart.  However, when such happens, it’s also important to say why.  By not explaining how it so quickly arrived at a very different moral judgment about LIV, the PGA hit the ball into a bunker of “Single-Minded Marketing.”
​
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
5 Comments

A 3D Approach to Corporate Social Media Responsibility

6/6/2023

12 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch - professor of marketing at Messiah University -
​author of 
Honorable Influence - founder of Mindful Marketing 

Most of us receive warnings during our lives whether they’re about talking in class, highway speeding, or forgetting to pay a bill.  When the U.S. surgeon general issues a warning, it’s a serious admonition for everyone, usually about some potential physical harm.  So, when the physician in chief warns about the dangers of social media, what should the organizations that use it do?
 
The New York Times has called U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy’s most recent warning “an extraordinary public advisory,” which is saying something since warnings from the nation’s top doctor are uncommon and have included some grave concerns like AIDS, drunk-driving, obesity, video game violence, gun violence, and, of course, cigarettes.
 
How could social media possibly warrant the same level of concern?
 
Gen Z uses Instagram to share fun videos, parents turn to Facebook to celebrate family milestones, and professionals leverage LinkedIn to post and find job opportunities, all of which seem like positive and productive things.  Unfortunately, though, most of us also have read about, if not experienced, social media’s negative impact.
 
I teach about sociological and psychological influences on behavior, but I don’t use social media much, so I’d like to believe I’m above its affirmation-seeking lure.  However, I have to admit, there are times I’m disappointed that my posts don’t receive the numbers of likes and shares that those of others do.
 
Putting too much weight on other people’s reactions can be problematic, but it’s just one of social media’s potential pitfalls.  As the following two lists suggest, misuse of social media can impact individuals’ well-being mentally (M), physically (P), and socially (S) in many different ways.
 
First, Entrepreneur identifies four other pitfalls in its list of five social media dangers:
  1. Real-life interaction is replaced if you allow it (M, P, S)
  2. Feelings of envy emerge based on fabricated lives (M, S)
  3. Moments are missed and memorable experiences are diluted (M)
  4. Addiction (M, P, S)
  5. It can ruin your sleep, impacting your physical health (P)
 
Picture
 
Still, others suggest many more potential perils.  For instance, McMillen Health identifies 15 social media dangers:
  1. Sedentary behavior (P)
  2. Less sleep (P)
  3. Social Media addiction (M, P, S)
  4. Cyberbullying (M, S)
  5. Missing out on face-to-face relationships (S)
  6. Less time for other activities (M, P, S)
  7. Social comparisons (M, S)
  8. Affecting self-image (M)
  9. Damaging online reputation (M, S)
  10. Harmful to mental well-being (M)
  11. Misleading information (M, S)
  12. Scams (M, P)
  13. Normalizing risk-taking behaviors (P)
  14. Misleading marketing (M, P)
  15. Inappropriate content (M, P, S)
 
Although anyone can be negatively impacted in these ways, children and adolescents tend to feel social media’s impacts most acutely, partly because they’re heavy users of the platforms but mainly because individuals’ formative years are ones in which they often look to others for validation, and they more easily feel ostracized from their peers.
 
Mayo Clinic cites many studies that found evidence of adverse effects of social media on teens, including the following:
  • 12- to 15-year-olds in the U.S. who used social media for more than three hours a day were at greater risk of mental health problems.
  • For 13- to 16-year-olds in the U.K., using social media more than three times a day was associated with poor mental health and well-being.
  • Various studies have found links between social media use and symptoms of depression and anxiety.
 
Even with this evidence, it’s important to note that social media is not inherently bad.  As suggested at the onset of this piece, platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and others provide very worthwhile services that range from connecting people, to offering entertainment, to delivering education.
 
It also bears emphasizing that ultimately people are responsible for their own social media use.  Even in the case of so-called ‘addictive’ apps, like TikTok, people have the ability to stop using them without experiencing physical withdrawal symptoms associated with trying to stop smoking or doing drugs like cocaine and heroin.
 
One qualification, however, is that parents share some responsibility for the social media use of their children, especially younger ones.  Unlike adults, children can’t necessarily comprehend the potential risks because they lack life experience and knowledge of social  and psychological phenomenon.  It’s up to parents to help moderate their children’s social media use.
 
Notwithstanding the preceding points, if companies care about their own consumers and people in general, they should want to contribute to their well-being and help them avoid harm.

Here are three “Ds” every organization should do to make their social media use more responsible.
 
1. Discourage divisive content:  This is understandably a difficult phenomenon to police, but companies from the largest social media platforms to the smallest should work to eliminate content that unnecessarily pits people against each other.
 
While social media platforms shouldn’t be in the business of monetizing such content, all businesses should model civil dialogue and discourage polarizing posts.
 
2. Don’t allow abusive behavior:  The social media communication that likely weighs heaviest on young people’s mental health is the communication that involves bullying and/or shaming.  Yes, freedom of speech is important, but it shouldn’t mean that anything goes, particularly when that anything involves demeaning dialogue and personal attacks.
 
Smaller companies also can monitor their social media pages for abusive posts, removing them as they see them and banning users who make them.
 
3. Decrease overuse:  Bars stop serving patrons who have had too much to drink.  Social media platforms can at a minimum notify users of their time on the platform, similar to Apple’s screentime notifications.  Beyond that, platforms could also ask people to set their own time limits, before they start using the app, when they’re still thinking about their use rationally and objectively.
 
Of course, most business that use social media aren’t platforms or major apps.  Still, even small businesses can discourage social media overuse by limiting their posts to reasonable numbers, e.g., one or two a day versus four or five, which communicates to followers that they can and should have lives outside of their interactions with a single business.
 
Companies don’t need to stop using social media because of the U.S. surgeon general’s warning, but they should reassess how their use may be impacting people.  The three Ds described above don’t represent a comprehensive plan for responsible social media use, but they are important steps toward more “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
12 Comments
    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2024
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly