Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
  • Expand Your Mind
  • Contact

Paying with Your Personal Brand

3/23/2019

4 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

It was shocking to hear the news:  TV’s beloved “Aunt Becky” charged with fraud in “the biggest college admissions scam ever prosecuted in the U.S.”  Most people understand that a business model based on bribery is wrong, but there’s another angle to this story that's relevant to each of us, as marketers of ourselves.
 
To summarize the scandal, Lori Loughlin, who played Rebecca Donaldson-Katsopolis on the classic ABC sitcom Full House and the Netflix sequel Fuller House, and starred in the Hallmark's When the Heart Calls, was one of fifty people implicated in the admissions scandal that also netted actress Felicity Huffman, known for her role in ABC’s Desperate Housewives.  The mastermind of the manipulation was Rick Singer, CEO of The Key, which promised to help “the wealthiest families in the US” get their children into some of the country’s most prestigious colleges.

Many tutors, SAT prep courses, and other admissions aids honestly and legally help students improve their chances of acceptance to their preferred colleges.  So, how did Singer run afoul of the law?  He allegedly helped his clients’ children cheat on ACT and SAT tests, and he bribed college athletic department personnel so they would claim that certain students were recruits for their teams, even when some never played the sport in question.
 
However, perhaps the most devious thing Singer did was create “The Key Worldwide Foundation,” which was supposedly a charity that funded programs for underprivileged children in the U.S. and abroad.  In reality, the Foundation served as a front for money-laundering, or a way for the wealthy to pay Singer who then channeled bribes to accomplices on college campus that included USC, Yale, and New York University, among other prestigious schools.
 
As someone who works in higher education, has one child who recently graduated from college, and has another who is currently making his college decision, the admissions scandal hit close to home.  However, the scandal is even more unsettling to me as a marketer.
 
No, I’m not just talking about what Singer did.  His bad decisions to build a business based on cheating and bribery and to operate a fake foundation were certainly appalling and surprising.   What was even more amazing to me was the apparent ease in which he secured willing parties to the schemes, not just from the general population but from those representing high society and higher education—people who stereotypically ‘should know better.’ 
 
In addition to accomplished actresses Loughlin and Huffman, alleged scandal participants include an array of elite professionals from business, academia, and other fields.  Some of the specific individuals implicated, along with their current or former positions, are:
  • Rudolph Meredith, head women’s soccer coach at Yale University
  • John Vandemoer, sailing coach at Stanford University
  • Igor Dvorskiy, director of West Hollywood College Preparatory  School
  • Gordon Ernst, head tennis coach at Georgetown
  • Donna Heinel, a senior associate athletic director at USC
  • Jorge Salcedo, the head coach of UCLA men’s soccer
  • Gordon Caplan, New York attorney and co-chairman of the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher
  • Gregory Colburn, a radiation oncologist in Palo Alto
  • Robert Flaxman, chief executive and co-founder of Crown Realty & Development, and a Beverly Hills resident
  • Homayoun Zadeh, associate professor at USC’s Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry and director of the school’s Advanced Program in Periodontology

Why would so many smart and talented people risk their reputations and/or careers to associate with Singer.  The motives were likely mixed.  Of course, many of the participants were parents who may have been willing to do anything to see their children succeed.  Those who accepted bribes, probably wanted the money.  Some may have felt pressure to assist for the good of their institution.  Maybe some saw or heard of others doing similar things and rationalized ‘there’s safety in numbers.’
 
Whatever the motive, I doubt that many of the participants, if any, seriously thought that they would get caught.  If they did, they probably wouldn’t have participated.  Instead, they operated under the delusion that what could be hidden from public view didn’t matter.
 
That misconception is one of the biggest fallacies of marketing, in general, and personal branding, specifically.  In an article I wrote a couple of years ago, I aimed to debunk that myth by suggesting that a personal brand consists of three elements: character, competencies, and communication.  I likened the first two components to the layers of a cake and the last one to its icing.
 
Some individuals erroneously act as if they can overcome flawed character and inferior skills by spreading on a thick layer of overly flattering or even disingenuous communication.  Besides being dishonest, this approach only works for so long.  Eventually cracks in ‘the cake’ show through the communication.  Unfortunately for them and others impacted by their indiscretions, those involved in the college admissions scandal seemed to subscribe to this hollow approach to personal branding.
 
As I was writing this blog post, my wife shared with me some very sad news.  A good friend of ours from early in our marriage had passed away suddenly at home, at the age of 58.  Mark Sneff was someone who built his personal brand the right way.  Even as he developed his competencies to rise to the top of the HR profession, his character exuded integrity.  Mark also was uniquely gifted at communicating “the truth in love”: He could offer an honest critique that felt like a high compliment.
 
As the outpouring of fond remembrances on his LinkedIn page suggests, Mark was a widely loved individual who many held in high regard.  I’m not sure he thought much about personal branding.  I am very confident, though, that he never would have resorted to a ruse to advance the educations or careers of his two children, who he loved greatly.  Interestingly, Mark was the first person I ever invited to speak to my college classes.
 
It’s so nice to know people who
‘market themselves’ the right way.  The recent college admissions scandal should be a reminder that it only take a moment to destroy a personal brand that took decades to build.  Unfortunately, that fact means that Loughlin and all who participated in Singer’s schemes, not only injured themselves and others, they’re also guilty of “Mindless Marketing.”

Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
4 Comments
Susan Vigliano
3/24/2019 07:11:39 pm

I was also sadden by the parents misunderstanding about what they were actually doing to their own children. Cheating to get them I didn’t help their kids. It told their kids that they didn’t have the grit and discipline to make their own way. They sent a crippling message to their own kids. It’s empowering to earn our own way through hard work. To rob your child of that experience is abusive. They also invested in the things that can be taken from their kids, not the deeper, character-forming qualities that would actually take them somewhere important to their own identity and destiny. I’m sad for the kids and that the parents would choose to harm their own kids. Imagine the shame the kids carry now after being exposed. It’s sad.

Reply
Jireh Bagyendera
9/13/2019 11:34:55 am

I was not particularly disappointed or surprised by the actions of the parents involved in this this scandal. Parents will often bend the rules to see their children succeed. These individuals had the means and Singer had an elaborate plan. The only reason we are hearing about this is because the scammers got caught.

It should not have been that easy fake it into top schools. This suggests that there are not enough controls to work against biased or undeserved entry.

These families will most likely escape unscathed and their fans will soon forget. I believe that if the rest of society had the same financial reach, most of us would have taken the same steps. Yes, most of humanity's character 'cakes' are filthy. Thankfully, Jesus changes all of this.

Reply
Isabela Middlebrook
11/5/2019 12:07:05 am

I thought the parents had good intentions about cheating their kids into school. They wanted the best for their kids but i think that original intention to do the write thing became the urge to be the best. Everyone involved in the scandal is at fault, technically, it is an illegal action but i think their heart was in the right place. the lying was obviously wrong so I agree consequences need to be given for those actions.

Reply
Lacey Reynish
11/5/2019 08:37:21 pm

I don't think that the parents that did this for their kids had bad intentions but that justify what they did. I would definitely see a bad judge of character though to the faculty and staff that allowed this to happen since it is their responsibility to uphold the university's standards in a good way. I definitely think they should be held responsible for their actions whether their intentions are good or not.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2020
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly