Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
  • Expand Your Mind
  • Contact

Is ESPN OK with Abuse?

10/12/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
It’s nice when organizations candidly share customers’ comments, even when they’re not flattering.  There are times, though, when negative feedback shouldn’t be shared.  Here’s one of those cases.  

Alabama football fan, “Phyllis from Mulga,” is a regular caller to Paul Finebaum’s ESPN radio show, which is also televised on the SEC network.  Known for unabashedly speaking her mind, Phyllis was in especially rare form recently when she called to complain to Finebaum about a comment made by one of his ESPN colleague’s, Colin Cowherd.  After Alabama’s loss to Ole Miss, Cowherd suggested that head coach Nick Saban’s football dynasty was ending—a contention that Phyllis vehemently rejected (gross understatement).

Phyllis’s minute-and-a-half tirade included a crude alteration of Cowherd’s last name, mockery of his professional knowledge and ability, accusations of envy, and profanity.  Of course, this summary is a sterilization of what Phyllis actually said, which you can listen to here, if you'd like.

So, why should ESPN be criticized for the comments of an irate caller?  Because Phyllis’s remarks and the anger in which she communicated them went well over the line of spirited debate or heated argument; her rant was abusive.  No person, regardless of his/her position, should be verbally attacked and insulted in such a way, privately or publicly.

“But,” you may be thinking, “it wasn’t ESPN that said those things, it was a caller.”  ESPN, however, has intentionally continued to share those comments on the air (e.g., Sports Center) and on-line.  Why? Probably because Phyllis's shocking comments represent intriguing programming that captures viewers’ attention and drives hits.

Personal abuse unfortunately takes many forms.  Given ESPN’s recent, thorough coverage of the NFL’s numerous cases of domestic violence, the network should be very familiar with the consequences of physical abuse.  Verbal abuse is also very harmful.  It’s a form of bullying and a close relative of physical abuse—the two often go hand-in-hand . . . It’s not hard to imagine cases in which verbal abuse precedes physical abuse.

In these situations, Phyllis and highly emotive callers like her can be considered both perpetrators and victims.  On one hand, such callers are first and foremost the ones responsible for what comes out of their own mouths.  On the other hand, media that in any way encourage or promote such caustic banter are complicit and may be cited for abusing the abusers.

From a marketing perspective, ESPN’s decision to rebroadcast and showcase Phyllis’s call represents “singled-minded marketing.”  Although such shock programming has apparently created value for certain ESPN stakeholders, the network’s promotion of verbal abuse ultimately undermines several important societal values, including human dignity, decency, and respect.

People don't always need to agree with each other.  Healthy debate is a good thing.  One of the last things any culture should want to encourage, however, is the idea that it’s funny or otherwise acceptable to berate another person, attacking the individual instead of the issue.  Likewise, for some people, participation in verbal abuse may be a stepping stone towards other forms of abuse that are equally bad or worse.

Notwithstanding the preceding discussion, ESPN is a good network that does many things right.  This history offers hope that the network and others similarly responsible will be more discerning going forward and opt for more mindful marketing.
Picture
Picture
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter
1 Comment
Luke Gibson
12/10/2014 10:06:38 am

I do not believe ESPN is promoting abuse. In the media industry, drama, which can often include disrespect, draws viewers. Rightly or wrongly, this is a fact. Now, this could easily turn into an ethics debate, but that is very different topic.
ESPN simply allows individuals to speak their mind, albeit sometimes pervasively, but the words spoken are tied to the individual speakers, NOT the network. I am not saying these are my opinions, but just societies views on the matters. ESPN does a good job of paying people for their thoughts, but separating themselves from the individuals when the media doesn't like something said.
I would say ESPN allows for abuse, but is neither OK with or promoting abuse.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2020
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly