Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
  • Expand Your Mind
  • Contact

A Dirty Mr. Clean

2/4/2017

5 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

Falcon fans watching Super Bowl LI wished they’d never seen some things, like the incredible catch by Patriots receiver Julian Edelman and the winning touchdown run by James White.  Some other viewers also saw something they wish they’d never seen: a super sensual ad featuring a sexed-up Mr. Clean.

The latest Super Bowl contained many memorable commercials, but the Mr. Clean spot may be the most difficult to forget. In the ad, a wanton woman imagines an unusually buff animated spokesman strutting about her home in a skin-tight white t-shirt and form-fitting pants.  Carefully cropped camera shots capture the brand icon flexing his biceps and swaying his hips to the sound of a sexy R & B song with the lyrics “Got what you want, got what you need.  Be your dreamboat be your fantasy.  I'll be your ecstasy.”
 
Throughout the ad, the actress leers lustfully and dances suggestively with the cartoon character, who gives new meaning to the term “all-purpose cleaner.”  Then suddenly she comes back to reality when her husband/partner emerges from the animation asking, “Sara, Sara?  Clean enough?”  By that time her libido has gotten the best of her and she tackles him over the back of the couch in a lip-locked embrace.
 
Like the spot itself, on-line reaction to the ad has been very ‘animated.’  On YouTube, one reviewer feigned worry, “I have no doubt my girl will leave me for Mr. Clean,” while another exclaimed, “that moment where you actually want to watch an ad.”  Overall, reaction to the promotion was positive:  So far, almost 28,000 YouTube viewers have given it a thumbs up, and only about 3,100 have voted it down.
 
It’s hard to say whether the ad will increase sales of the cleaning solution, but there is potential.  Unlike many other Super Bowl spots that left us asking “What was that for?”, the Mr. Clean commercial was unmistakably tied to cleaning, which was a step in the right direction.  A shopper in a grocery store, scanning the shelves for cleaning supplies, might at least think, “Mr. Clean, I’ve heard of that.” 
 
So, if the majority of people like the Mr. Clean commercial, and there’s potential that the ad will increase sales, Procter & Gamble (parent of the brand) must have made a good creative decision, right?  Not so fast.
 
First, it will be interesting to see the long-term impact that a sexy Mr. Clean has on the brand.  P&G is a diverse corporation whose holdings include the likes of Bounty, Charmin, Crest, Dawn, Luvs, Oral-B, Pampers, Swiffer, Tide, and Vicks.  Other than a couple of unusual exceptions like Old Spice, which targets young males, most P&G brands are wholesome and family-oriented—an image that the new Mr. Clean doesn’t uphold.  P&G as a whole is protected, however, because it doesn’t place everything under the same corporate label, like Apple and Nike do.  Instead, P&G uses individual branding, which helps separate people’s perceptions of each P&G product.
 
In any case, once a company uses sex to sell, it’s hard to reestablish a wholesome image—just ask GoDaddy, which several years later is still remembered for its series of sexually explicit Super Bowl ads.  More specifically, will we ever be able to think of the Mr. Clean character the same way again?  He’s gone from being an unemotional symbol of practical cleaning strength to a sexy ‘player’ who will potentially put the moves on any woman he desires.

Such sexualized branding is not family-friendly.  Although, children aren’t the target market for cleaning supplies, there are spillover effects, especially when the advertising occurs in widely-viewed broadcasts, like the Super Bowl.  Also, the ad in question ironically inferred that women like men who clean, but it’s unlikely that most men will be captivated by Mr. Clean’s new image.  At least I’m not, and I’m a man who cleans.
 
Also not family-friendly is the ad’s promotion of unhealthy sexual fantasies.  It’s always dangerous to substitute desire for a husband or wife with someone or something else.  “But wait a minute,” you may be thinking, “He’s just a cartoon.  It’s supposed to be funny.”  That’s true, yet there’s an anatomical realism and life-likeness to this Mr. Clean that makes the lusting much more legitimate than if it were for, say, the Michelin Man.
 
Similarly, the ad tries to sneak-in sex by having a woman ogle a man.  More people would likely be put-off if the roles were reversed and it were a man mentally undressing a woman.  The act of sexual objectification should be offensive no matter who’s doing it.  Yes, it can seem kind of funny when women objectify men (e.g., “Look at that set of guns”), because it usually doesn’t happen that way.  However, the acceptance of such female-male objectification desensitizes people to all forms of sexual objectification, and makes the more common male-female kind seem okay.

A final irony involves the perceptual disconnect between a product that aims to make things clean, and a spokes-character that acts ‘dirty.’  Granted, his actions aren’t dirty in a grease and grime sense, but they’re still easily perceived as impure and adulterated.  That’s close enough to being a direct contradiction that most brands wouldn’t want to risk the association.
 
As mentioned above, this Mr. Clean commercial might help stimulate short-term sales.  It’s doubtful, however, that the sexualization of the animated character will produce long-term benefits for the brand, even as it puts a stain on society.  For these reasons, sexy Mr. Clean is a case of “Mindless Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
5 Comments
Nate Rettberg
3/23/2017 08:04:34 pm

I agree with your discussion on this topic, especially in regards to the long-term effects of this type of advertisement. I think using sex as a means to be memorable is effective for the short-term sales, but in this case this rebranding will surely only hurt the image in the consumer's eyes. I think this type of product cannot benefit from this type of mindless marketing, especially considering the family oriented history.

Reply
Spencer Santos
3/27/2017 01:42:46 am

Homes without sex would not be homes. Kitchens with out Mr.Clean would not be kitchens. But should the two mix?
Never! They each have their own separate areas in life. One in kitchen and the other the bed room. Combining these vastly different aspects of the home on screen shows a lack of respect and understanding of the family. These types of advertisements are challenging to navigate at the dinner table when a ten year old wonders at the mothers reaction to a bald, very white man. Seeing the needs of the family and meeting them effectively has been a task that Mr. Clean has filled for decades.
Trying to work past this 'sexifed' image can be devilish for P&G. The stigma that a company receives from this type of branding will last long into their history if not dealt with deftly.

Reply
essayuniverse reviews link
8/30/2017 10:57:11 am

The ad was looking pretty attractive and different as compare to many. It sounds like many brands were able to attract to it, it can obtain results however ethics and sophistication also matters. Thanks for this share.

Reply
star news link
11/5/2018 04:52:58 am

That is always impressive for me to get this done via such information. Thank you for sharing your article

Reply
worldforpcapp link
4/23/2020 03:24:28 am

thanks.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2020
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly