Mindful Marketing
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Mindful Meter & Matrix
    • Leadership
  • Mindful Matters Blog
  • Engage Your Mind
    • Mindful Ads? Vote Your Mind!
    • Forum - Speak Your Mind
  • Expand Your Mind
  • Contact

Corporate Social Responsibility Everyone Should See

9/19/2020

7 Comments

 
Talking pill bottles

by David Hagenbuch - professor of Marketing at Messiah University - 
author of Honorable Influence - founder of Mindful Marketing

By now we all have a story of how the pandemic has negatively impacted us or those we love.  Life has become more difficult for everyone, but for people with disabilities, daily living can be exponentially harder.  One business, however, has made it its mission to meet such needs in an unforeseen way.
 
Two years ago I wrote about Starbuck’s innovative efforts to serve deaf consumers through a specially-designed store in Washington, D.C.  Among its unique attributes, the store featured an open layout, low-glare surfaces, and employees who knew American Sign Language (ASL).
 
Even as I, a non-coffee-drinker, applauded the company’s ingenuity and initiative, I could imagine some cynicism about the social responsibility:  “That’s nice, but Starbuck’s is a luxury people can live without.  Who’s meeting the real needs of people with disabilities?”  A former student of mine recently gave me a great answer to that question.
 
I first heard of Accessible Pharmacy a few weeks ago when that former student, Jason Polansky, told me he was applying to the company for a job.  Jason, who wrote a guest blog for Mindful Marketing about a smart cane and who was my coauthor on a CommPRO article titled, “How Serving Blind Consumers Creates Competitive Advantage,” is completely blind.
 
Fast forward to a few days ago when I received from Jason the good news that Accessible Pharmacy had hired him to be its Director of Business Development for Central Pennsylvania.  It’s great that the company identified Jason as an ideal candidate for the position and offered it to him.  However, Accessible Pharmacy’s commitment to blind people runs much deeper than its hiring.  Its mission is to make a life-sustaining service safely available to a group of consumers who are consistently underserved.


Accessible Pharmacy logo

According to the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC), in the United States in 2015, there were 1.02 million blind people, i.e., who had vision impairment of 20/200 or worse.  Furthermore, 3.22 million Americans had lesser impairment as measured by “the best-corrected visual acuity in the better-seeing eye.”  These numbers are expected to double by 2050 due to an aging U.S. population and more frequent incidents of diabetes and other chronic diseases associated with vision loss.
 
That’s a significant and growing portion of the population that could benefit from all kinds of products tailored to its unique needs.  As Starbuck’s example illustrated, some business models already have been adapted, but largely missing has been a solution for one of the most critical human needs:  medicine.
 
People who are blind take most of the same medicine others do, but for individuals who don’t drive, there’s the challenge of traveling to a pharmacy to pick up a prescription.  Even more significant, blind people can’t easily read the instructions on a bottle of ibuprofen or see that the prescription pill they’re about to ingest is the right one. 
 
According to a 2018 CNBC article, between 250,000 and 440,000 people die each year in the United States because of medical errors, making them the third-leading cause of death, behind only heart disease and cancer.  Unfortunately, the inability to see the medicine one is taking contributes to those statistics.
 
German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche famously said, “That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.”  Medicine certainly is supposed to make people stronger, but wrongly medicating can kill a person, especially someone who can’t see the medicine they’re taking.
 
Enter Accessible Pharmacy, “a comprehensive, home delivery pharmacy service specializing in the needs of the blind and low vision community and their families,” which claims to be “the only provider of its kind.”
 
For many companies, asserting such exclusivity is merely a matter of marketing communication, i.e., they simply say that they “specialize” and do nothing to support the claim.  Accessible Pharmacy is different.  Its ‘product features’ back up its brand promise.  For instance, the Pharmacy offers:
  • Patient education and consultation
  • Disease monitoring via teleconference
  • Cognitive behavior assistance
  • Medication regimen management
  • Customized packaging
  • Presorted disposable pill organizers by week or by month
  • Braille and large-print labels
  • ScripTalk: unique RFID tag labels that work with consumer devices to convert text to speech
  • Home delivery of prescriptions, as well as over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and supplements
 
In researching and writing about corporate social responsibility (CSR), I’ve often considered whether there’s a best way for companies to give back.  Although I believe donation (giving money to worthy causes) and volunteerism (encouraging employees to serve those in need) are both important approaches, the most effective CSR occurs within a business model that marries financial goals with societal good.

Picture

In other words, positive social impact is woven into the very fabric of the business’s operations.  Accessible Pharmacy is an excellent example of such integrated CSR.
 
Yes, the firm is a for-profit company with income expectations—a fact that might give some people pause.  But should we be wary of Accessible Pharmacy making money by serving blind people?
 
Of course, there are other ways that organizations doing social good can be funded, for instance by donors and by government.  Such models play important roles in addressing societal needs; however, what happens when donors decide to give elsewhere or politicians elect to underwrite other needs?
 
The point is, CSR that’s integrated into a for-profit firm’s value chain is highly sustainable.  As long as both producer and consumer benefit, the mutually valuable exchange can continue indefinitely.
 
When I asked Jason what excites him most about his new position, he mentioned working with people with disabilities and using his marketing background to make a positive impact on their lives.  He undoubtedly will enjoy both intrinsic and extrinsic rewards from his work, as he should.  So should his employer.
 
It’s very challenging to start and run a successful business.  It’s even harder to maintain one that addresses pressing societal needs as part of its mission.  Accessible Pharmacy does just that, which make it a clear example of “Mindful Marketing.”


Mindful Matrix
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
7 Comments

Live Streaming Funerals

10/18/2019

32 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

What will you watch on TV tonight?  Maybe you’ll catch a movie on cable or stream season five of your favorite sitcom.  Or, maybe you’ll tune-in to Uncle Walter’s wake.  That’s right:  Some funeral homes now make it possible for mourners to stay home, thanks to live streaming of memorial services.
 
Live streaming has been around for more than 20 years, but it’s more recently that funeral homes have entered the virtual realm.  Some say the delay is due to the funeral industry being more conservative than most.  It also might be because those most in-tune with the newer technology tend to be the Netflix-watching younger generations, who probably aren’t the biggest drivers of demand for funeral services.
 
Every year in the United States, around 19,000 funeral directors conduct approximately 2.4 million memorial services, yet some estimate as few as 20% of funeral homes offer streaming services.  But, why does anyone want to watch the memorialization of someone they knew online?
 
The main reason is simple logistics.  As people find new jobs or move for other reasons, family members and friends are “increasingly scattered around the country—and the world,” making it hard to travel to far-away cities and towns for funerals.  Also, some people have health conditions or other constraints that make travel very difficult, if not impossible.
 
Our family appreciated live streaming firsthand recently, not for a funeral but for our son’s orchestra concert.  Given that he’s enrolled in college over 10 hours from home, it’s not possible for us to attend most performances, but we were able to watch the first concert of the fall in real-time, thanks to the school live streaming the event.
 
Still, a funeral is very different than a concert, a sports contest, or other audience-driven entertainment.  Should such a somber event be so widely shared?  Is it disrespectful to ‘digitize the deceased?’
 
Whether it’s a wedding or a wake, almost anything can be filmed tastelessly or tactfully.  Small ceiling-mounted cameras and wireless technology are some of the ways that videoing can happen unobtrusively.  Plus, in the age of social media and selfies, most people are pretty used to cameras and picture-taking.

Of course, a primary consideration in deciding whether to live stream a funeral should be the final wishes of the departed—Did they want/not want their last remembrances broadcast?  Short of any such directive, the decision lies with loved ones, who, in reality, are the ones the memorial service is truly for.     
 
For family members and/or close friends of the deceased, a funeral service is a very important part of the grieving process.  They’re the ones dealing most with shock, grief, and worry.  They also probably want to honor the memory of someone about whom they cared deeply.  Key questions, then, are:  What brings loved ones comfort and what helps them commemorate?
 
The most likely answer is other people.  When tragedy strikes or there’s an occasion to celebrate, we usually want to be with others.  It’s at those times that we really appreciate the presence of people.   
 
That need for social support reminds me of a funeral I attended last March.  A dear friend of mine, with whom I had served on a church leadership team, played basketball and softball, and socialized with our spouses, passed away suddenly at age 58.  I was shocked to hear the news and imagined that his wife and two children in their twenties were devastated.
 
Our careers had taken us to different parts of the state, but I wanted to attend his memorial service, even though it was on a weekday and about two hours away.  I drove to the church and reflected on my friends’ impactful life during what was a very moving service.  I also spoke briefly with his children and wife, giving her a hug and telling her how much I had appreciated her husband.
 

Picture

A couple of months later, I received a handwritten note from her in which she said how happy she was that I was able to come to the service and how much it meant to see an old friend from a special time in their lives.  I had barely spoken with her at the funeral, so it seemed that just my being there made a big difference for her.
 
That experience makes me wonder whether live streaming funerals keeps people from being present at times when their presence is needed most?  I doubt there’s data to shed light on that question, so I’ll try to answer it based on the reading I’ve done in preparation for this piece.
 
Journalists who have spoken with funeral directors suggest that live streams are most important to those who are unable to attend funerals because of factors like distance, cost, and health issues.  No one mentions people who could attend services in person, choosing to watch live streams instead.
 
Such decision-making also resonates with my own experience.  When my friend passed away suddenly, I really wanted to be there, and thankfully I was able to.  I’m not sure if his memorial service was live streamed, but even if it was, my choice would not have changed.  I suspect most people feel similarly—For someone important to them, they would like to be there in person, if at all possible.
 
Live streaming funerals is almost certainly a win-win:  The opportunity to watch from afar doesn’t dissuade people from attending but gives those who can’t travel the ability to also experience a very meaningful moment.  Even when it involves death, digital technology can deliver “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
32 Comments

Walmart Says Goodbye to Greeters

5/3/2019

2 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

When you walk into a Walmart this month, you won’t see someone who’s been a fixture at the front of its stores for decades—the greeter.  The world’s largest retailer’s decision to eliminate the iconic position quickly drew harsh criticism, which seemed to take the company by surprise and has made many wonder:  Was Walmart right to send loyal employees into unemployment?

In mid-February this year, the big box retailer informed employees that effective April 26, the greeter role would be replaced by an expanded “customer host” position, requiring a greater range of job skills and physical demands like being able “to lift 25-pound (11-kilogram) packages, climb ladders and stand for long periods.”
 
Those who have worked in organizations for any significant time know it’s not unusual for positions to be added, deleted, and changed.  What’s different about Walmart’s move is that its 1.5 million U.S. associates make it  the nation’s largest private employer, and many of those who have filled the greeter role have been people with disabilities.
 
Given that unique employment impact, it’s understandable that many have not liked the change.  Fred Wirth, whose son Joe uses a wheelchair and who worked as a Walmart greeter before losing his job, claimed the company’s plan was “just a systematic way of getting rid of all the disabled people.”
 
Could Wirth’s claim be true?  Is the world’s largest retailer intentionally trying to displace workers with disabilities?
 
To answer that question, it’s helpful to understand the legal context for any such agenda.  Title I of the American’s with Disabilities Act “prohibits covered employers from discriminating against people with disabilities in all employment-related activities, including hiring, pay, benefits, firing and promotions.”
 
Organizations aren’t expected to employ people who cannot perform the functions of a job.  However, firms are required to provide “reasonable accommodation” for individuals with disabilities.  For instance, a company could modify the height of a service desk in order to allow an individual in a wheelchair to more comfortably interact with customers.
 
To its credit, Walmart has tried to transition disabled greeters into different positions and otherwise accommodate them.  It began to do so in 2015, when it started a pilot program that introduced the customer host position, who not only greets customers but also keeps the entrances safe and clean, assists with returns, and checks receipts as needed.  During this program, the company claims it was able to help 80% of affected associates find new positions, many involving promotions.
 
Greg Foran, president and CEO of Walmart's U.S. stores, says that it’s the company’s goal to offer “appropriate accommodations that will enable these associates to continue in other roles with their store.”  For instance, the company was able to offer jobs in self-checkout to three longtime greeters, all of whom have cerebral palsy.
 
Unfortunately, not every former greeter could be reasonably accommodated or had skills that would readily translate to other work.  For these reasons, Walmart has extended the 60 day transition period in order to allow extra time for greeters with disabilities to find other jobs within the company.
 
Besides what seems to be a good faith effort to continue to employ individuals with disabilities, it’s worth noting that Walmart historically has been one of few employers to actively hire people with disabilities.  It’s easy to criticize Walmart for its recent move away from greeters, but how many associates with disabilities do we see working in Target or most other retailers?
 
It’s also important to recognize retail’s great state of flux.  The sector has become extremely competitive, largely due to e-commerce and online giant Amazon, which has helped precipitate store closings for some of the greatest retailers ever, e.g., Sears, Kmart, and Toys R Us.
 
Furthermore, when consumers do shop in-store, they are increasingly greeted by touchscreen kiosks and self-checkouts, not people.  The grocery store where our family shops has a robot, rather than a person, roaming the floors to look for spills and dropped products.
 
Most of these technological advancements are driven by firms’ desires for greater efficiency and effectiveness.  There also are times for most of us when it’s just easier to deal with a machine than a person.  Nothing against bank tellers, but most people probably prefer to get cash from an ATM and to have funds deposited electronically into their accounts.
 
In the digital age, most people also probably don’t care about being greeted as soon as they enter a big box retailer.  For some, it may even be a turn-off.
 
One of the greatest gifts any of us can be given is a job, but employment should be more than biding time to get a paycheck.  Work should be meaningful to the person doing it, as well as to the company paying for it and to others ‘consuming’ it.  The position of Walmart store greeter once served a more useful purpose, but it has outlived its useful life.
 
You probably wouldn’t want to sit or stand in the same place, day after day, repeating over and over, “Welcome to Walmart” to largely apathetic passersby.  I wouldn’t.  Most people, including individuals with disabilities, are capable of much more.
 
Even certain advocates for the disabled have applauded Walmart’s efforts to transition greeters to other positions.  For instance, senior disability specialist at National Disability Rights Network Cheryl-Bates-Harris says, “Walmart is now opening the door to actually help individuals realize their full employment potential.”
 
So, it’s very unlikely that Walmart is intentionally trying to displace disabled workers.  More likely, it wants to remain viable in a fiercely competitive retail arena, which will, in turn, allow it to continue to employ millions of people, including those with disabilities.
 
Sometimes organizations need to make tough decisions that negatively impact certain people in the short-run.  However, offering meaningful work that provides valuable service to others in the long-run equals “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
2 Comments

How a Blind Marketing Student Sees a Smart Cane

3/8/2019

31 Comments

 
Picture

by Jason Polansky, Marketing Major at Messiah College

I enjoy each day without something that many take for granted—eyesight.  To safely navigate a sight-friendly word, a blind person develops other aptitudes, like a keener sense of hearing, and learns to use technology, such as a smartphone with GPS.  Now one company has developed a hi-tech version of a tool blind folks have used forever—the cane.  The thought of a ‘smart cane’ is intriguing, but is it Mindful Marketing?    
 
A few years ago, members of Turkey’s Young Guru Academy (YGA), a nonprofit organization aimed at assisting disadvantaged members of society, began to develop WeWALK, a smart cane that uses ultrasonic sensors, microphones, and speakers to help individuals with visual impairments “see obstacles.”  More specifically, a WeWALK hardware unit attaches to the handle of a blind person's cane, allowing him/her to more easily navigate outdoor environments.
 
Despite its recent start, the company has rapidly gained a social media following on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.  The firm also has been featured on CNN International, NowThis, Forbes, Dr. Oz, and certain New York City television outlets.
 
What features and benefits does WeWALK  offer that have spurred its rapid rise?  The following list summarizes key parts of the new product’s value proposition:
 
  • vibration and an ultrasonic sensor to detect overhead and chest-level obstacles, such as hanging tree branches and telephone poles
  • a compass, accelerometer, and gyroscope for GPS technology and Google Maps integration
  • Bluetooth connectivity, to be paired with an iOS or Android smartphone and integration with apps such as Google Maps
  • touch controls that allow users to access their smart phone via the device itself, without having to remove the phone from a pocket, purse, or backpack
  • a microphone and speaker for voice control and Amazon Alexa integration
  • support for Turkish and English languages
  • approximately five hours of battery life
  • charging via a micro USB port
  • weight of 430 grams
  • length of approximately one foot
  • open platform for app developers to add integrations with the device
  • purchase price of $349 through Indiegogo
 
I applaud the idea and the innovation behind WeWALK and appreciate several of its strengths.  For instance, overhead obstacle detection is a feature that I would find helpful. Oftentimes when I go hiking, or even when I am just walking down the sidewalk in a residential area, I never know when I am going to encounter an overhead object like a tree branch or some low-hanging sign.
 
In addition, the ability to connect to a smartphone via Bluetooth could save time and provide convenience by not having to hold a phone in one hand and a cane in the other.  Allowing a free hand is a plus.
 
However, WeWALK also has some significant limitations.  First, it does not attach to all types of canes that blind people use. I personally prefer a light-weight, rigid, National Federation of the Blind white cane with a metal tip, but WeWALK does not currently attach to this type of cane. Most of the canes that the device attaches to are much heavier and bulkier in nature. However, AppleVis does say that the firm has a goal of attaching to every popular cane in the world.
 
Another concern is how well the product can withstand the elements. Due to it being an outdoor product filled with many electronic components, one must be aware of rain during all seasons, as well as winter snow and summer heat. A useful addition to the product would be a protective case of some sort that would not muffle the sound from the speaker.
 
Speaking of the speaker, I would be interested in knowing how much volume can be produced. Outdoor environments can be quite noisy, due to traffic, construction, and other noises that may prevent the user from being able to hear its audio feedback while holding the cane at arm’s length.
 
It’s also worth noting that a five-hour battery life may not be enough to get someone through an entire day of traveling, especially while on vacation or otherwise being a tourist.  Maybe this deficiency could be remedied by charging through an extra external battery that the user could carry in his or her backpack or purse. However, that power supplement would mean a rather long cord attaching the battery to the device, as well as extra weight.
 
One also must acknowledge the limitations inherent in any GPS product for the Blind.  A GPS won’t tell a pedestrian when it’s safe to cross the street, the path to take through construction, nor will GPS directly lead the user across a large parking lot. Just about any blind person who is an experienced traveler would say that possessing strong mobility skills and knowing how to travel safely is essential before attempting to use any GPS product.
 
Just as when driving a car, a GPS will tell the driver how to get to the desired destination most of the time, but it does not know the rules of the road. It does not tell the driver to stop at a stop sign or obey the speed limit. Thus, I would not recommend this product to a blind person who does not possess adequate cane travel skills in the first place or who is fearful of traveling in unfamiliar environments.
 
Beyond the preceding limitations, a big turn-off for me is some of the language used on the firm’s about page. The first line says “WeWALK is the world's most revolutionary smart cane developed for the visually impaired people.”  Using the word “the” before “visually impaired people” is a rather patronizing way of describing the target market, just as it is insensitive to use “the” before the name of a racial group.  Furthermore, I don’t believe “blind” is a negative word, and I feel it’s fine to use “blind” when describing people who are not completely blind.
 
A better way to phrase the webpage phrase may be:

“WeWALK is the world's most revolutionary smart cane developed for blind and visually impaired individuals, allowing for greater independence and mobility through innovative technology,”
or

“WeWALK is the world's most revolutionary smart cane, strategically built with the blind in mind, combining the white cane that you have known and loved for decades with ground-breaking technological advancements.”

 
In any case, the company should seriously rethink this use of language as it moves forward.
 
Overall, WeWALK is a decent and well-intentioned product that shouldn’t cause any serious harm.  Still, at a price of $349, there are plenty of ways in which the product must improve before it can truly compete within the marketplace of technology and other tools targeted for blind and visually impaired individuals.  Sometime in the future, WeWALK may be Mindful, but at this point I see the smart cane as “Simple-Minded Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
31 Comments

Betting on Sports Gambling

12/28/2018

28 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

What skills did your parents teach you when you were growing up?  Maybe they showed you how to throw a baseball, ride a bike, or drive a car.  If Buffalo Wild Wings launches a major initiative it’s considering, moms and dads might start teaching their kids a whole new set of skills, like how to place bets on teams that will cover spreads in big games.
 
On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 1992 federal law that largely outlawed sports betting, thereby giving states authority over such gambling.  Several states, like Delaware and New Jersey, quickly legalized sports betting, and many others are poised to follow suit.  It’s hard to imagine policymakers resisting the revenue potential sports gambling represents, which is the same reason Buffalo Wild Wings is considering adding gambling to its menu.
 
There’s certainly nothing wrong with businesses, including those in the highly-competitive restaurant space, looking for other sources of sales.  Furthermore, some restaurants, like Dave and Buster’s, have become successful by marketing experiences alongside entrées.  But, is playing arcade games the same as putting down money on NFL games?

Leisure is in many ways a personal preference.  Everyone needs to relax and refresh at times, in ways that work for them, so who’s to say someone is wrong to spend his/her free time and money reading books, riding bikes, watching movies, or wagering on the outcomes of soccer games?  If done in excess, most leisure activities could potentially be harmful, but gambling appears to carry a unique set of risks for the gambler and others:
  • Financial Risks:  Problem gamblers can easily fall into a downward spiral of debt, leading them to max out credit cards, fail to make mortgage payments, or even declare bankruptcy.
  • Relationship Risks:  Compulsive gambling can lead to neglect of children, fights with spouses, and divorce.
  • Health Risks: Problem gamblers often suffer from stress, anxiety, low self-esteem, and depression, as well as related physical symptoms such as insomnia, high blood pressure, migraines, and heart disease.  Such individuals also are likely to use alcohol and drugs as coping mechanisms, or even commit suicide.
  • Job Risks:  Individuals with gambling problems are frequently absent from work and less productive when they are on the job, often because of their misuse of company time.
 
While most leisure activities tend not to become obsessions, gambling addiction is very real.  Studies have shown that those addicted to gambling exhibit many of the same behavioral and neurological symptoms that drug addicts experience.  What’s more, bookstores and bicycle shops don’t need to run disclaimers in their ads, “Have a reading addiction?” or “Biking problem?  Call . . .”, but casinos put disclaimers like this one on their websites: “Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER for help.”
 
The following statistics from Addiction Tips help put problem gambling into even clearer perspective:
  • Around 80 percent of the American population gambles in a given year.
  • About five out of 100 gamblers have a gambling addiction.
  • Of those age 14-21, 750,000 are addicted to gambling.
  • Most of those addicted to gambling are between the ages of 20 and 30.
  • Over 6% of students in U.S. colleges gamble regularly.
  • Gambling addiction is positively correlated with criminal activity, including violent crimes.

Gambling is a widespread and risky activity; however, the National Council on Problem Gambling acknowledges that “most adults who choose to gamble are able to do responsibly.”  With the legalization of sports betting, gambling activity is likely to explode, so why shouldn’t Buffalo Wild Wings add sports gambling to its menu?  That’s the question longtime ESPN host Mike Greenberg asked during an August 18, 2018 broadcast of his daily sports talk program Get Up!:
 
 “This doesn’t seem that complicated, unless I’m missing something . . . It seems like a lot more people will come [to Buffalo Wild Wings, if it adds gambling].  I don’t see any reason not to and I see every reason to . . . I am one who is in favor of gambling in a significant way, so I don’t see any downside to this.  Tell me what I’m missing if there is something.”
 
Here are some things that Greenberg may be overlooking about sports, gambling, and Buffalo Wild Wings:
 
  • Sports are extremely widespread:  There are over 440 internationally recognized sports and more than 8,000 indigenous sports, not necessarily recognized internationally. That pervasiveness means a virtually endless stream of easily-found betting opportunities.
  • Sports inspire passion among a very wide range of people:  Few things stir as much interest and excitement as sports, or enjoy such broad demographic appeal: men and women from toddlers to senior citizens love sports.  The 2018 Super Bowl drew over 103 million viewers in the U.S. alone, which provides some specific support of that extensive popularity. 
  • Gambling can be destructive and addictive: Several paragraphs above have already detailed many risks associated with gambling as well as its potential for addiction.
  • Buffalo Wild Wings is really big:  It’s the largest sports bar chain and the 17th largest restaurant chain in the U.S.  In 2017, it had sales of over $3.9 billion across 1,206 stores, which means Buffalo Wild Wings could expand sports betting across the country about as fast as any company  could.
  • Buffalo Wild Wings targets families:  The firm’s website suggests “Wednesday is for Family,” while promoting $2.99 kids’ meals from 4:00 pm - 8:00 pm from its seven-item, customizable kids’ menu.  Customers also perceive the restaurant as family-friendly, posting online comments like “Yes, this place [is] definitely suited [for] families,” “Fun sports environment with fun bar atmosphere and family restaurant at the same time,” and “an awesome family friendly restaurant.”
  • Buffalo Wild Wings targets college students:  The chain currently offers special promotions with 16 different universities, including the University of Alabama where football fans can get a free order of snack-size wings if Alabama records three or more sacks in a game.  A Google search of “Buffalo Wild Wings student discount” returns numerous hits of other college and universities that have negotiated special student discounts, such as one giving students at Northern Michigan University 10% off food items on Thursdays.  Also, the website Student Discount Program calls Buffalo Wild Wings “the ultimate place to get together with your friends, watch sports, drink beer and eat wings.”
 
Certainly, there are many people who gamble without causing serious harm to themselves or others.  Unfortunately, there also are 5 -7 million Americans, according to the National Council on Problem Gambling, who meet one or more of the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling, thus experiencing at least some of the undesirable outcomes mentioned above.  These numbers are likely to increase dramatically, as more states legalize betting on activities that have some of the broadest and most impassioned followings—sports.  People who don’t already gamble are probably more likely to start if they can bet on something they enjoy and understand.  For many people, that something is sports.
 
Because of its size and influence with sports fans, Buffalo Wild Wings would accelerate the growth of sports betting like few other companies could, should it choose to move forward with gambling.   However, that probability is only one concern.  Another is the impact Buffalo Wilds Wings would likely have on young people and their betting behavior.
 
As described earlier, Buffalo Wild Wings targets college students, many of whom love sports and already gamble.  These coeds will be easily won over to sports betting, although they can ill-afford it, both because of time (many should study more) and money (many college students have considerable debt).  However, an even younger demographic is at risk, should Buffalo Wild Wings begin sports betting.
 
As mentioned above, the chain also targets families with young children.  While it’s unlikely that any kids would place wagers at the restaurant, children do carefully observe and emulate the behavior of adults.  It’s sad to imagine so many children, most of whom love sports for the pure joy of playing or watching, being socialized into gambling on games.  Greenberg's Get Up! co-host Jalen Rose aptly expressed this sentiment as he said, "I don't want my grandpa teaching me about gambling at [age] seven."

 
It will be hard for Buffalo Wild Wings or any organization to resist the revenue that can come from entering the growing market for sports gambling.  Hopefully, however, the restaurant chain will recognize the unique influence it wields, especially on the lives of young people, and avoid betting on a strategy that can be considered “Single-Minded Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
28 Comments

Starbuck's Learns Sign Language

11/16/2018

19 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

If you’ve gone to a really loud concert, gotten a bad ear infection, or had a clogged ear canal, you know a little about hearing loss.  Over five percent of the world’s population has permanent “disabling hearing loss,” yet few organizations consider those consumers’ special needs.  One multinational corporation, however, has embraced this unique group of customers in a way that should make every company listen.
 
A few weeks ago, Starbuck’s opened its first Signing Store in the United States.  Located at 6th and H Street in Washington, D.C., the store first appears to be a typical Starbuck’s, but a closer look reveals a unique coffee house, specially designed for those who are deaf or hard of hearing.
 
For instance, the store features a more open layout and low-glare surfaces in order to facilitate visual communication.  Store employees, 20-25 of whom are themselves deaf or hard of hearing, are fluent in American Sign Language (ASL).  Deaf baristas wear “ASL aprons embroidered by a Deaf supplier,” while those who can hear sport “I Sign” pins.  The store also contains some high-tech advancements to ease ordering, such as “digital notepads and a console with two-way keyboards for back-and-forth typed conversations.”
 
Those adaptations sound nice, but should a global icon do so much to accommodate a relatively small number of people who tend to be scattered throughout the population?  With over 28,000 retail stores, Starbuck’s is by far the “largest coffeehouse company in the world,” as well as the third largest fast food restaurant, behind only McDonald’s and Subway.  The firm employs about 277,000 people and has annual revenues of over $24 billion.  In light of such scale, isn’t it an unnecessary distraction to design and operate a solitary store that’s so specialized?
 
First, it’s important to note that Starbuck’s Signing Store is strategically located near Gallaudet University, “a federally chartered private university for the education of the deaf and hard of hearing.”  Gallaudet enrolls over 1,100 students, and if they are like other college students, which they undoubtedly are, most probably love to drink coffee.  So, Starbuck’s has a ready-made, geographically concentrated target market, within a short walk of its store.
 
A second consideration is that a customized coffee shop is something that’s replicable.  In fact, the Washington, D.C. outlet is Starbuck’s second Signing Store.  The company opened the first one in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in 2016.  Perhaps there are suitable spots for similar stores in other parts of the U.S. or the world.  In American alone, there are nearly 50 residential schools for the deaf. 
 
Likewise, there may be opportunities to develop customized stores for individuals with other special needs.  For instance, there are nearly 40 schools for the blind in the U.S.  It also may be possible to tailor stores for certain fields of study, e.g., music or visual arts.

Third, Starbuck’s Signing store has produced some very positive PR for the company.  A Google search of “Starbuck’s Signing store” returns over 8 million hits, including many complimentary news pieces in major media like USA TODAY, CBS News, Fortune, and the Washington Post.  The National Association for the Deaf also has praised the company's efforts to educate and enrich the lives of its constituents and many others.
 
Fourth, and perhaps most important, the Signing Store fits squarely within Starbuck’s mission, values, and goals.  The company claims an “ongoing commitment to inclusion, accessibility and diversity,” which is broadly reflected in its mission statement: “To inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time."  More specifically, the first of Starbuck’s four core values encourages “Creating a culture of warmth and belonging, where everyone is welcome.”  This value is evident in the company’s 2018 goals, which include ongoing global social responsibility that creates “meaningful impact in the communities it serves.”

Although it’s unlikely that customized stores will ever be profitable on the scale of its traditional outlets, Starbuck’s should still be able to leverage the specialized model for meaningful growth.  Moreover, with every store opened to serve disadvantaged people groups, the company builds tremendous community goodwill and gains very positive global publicity.  For all these reasons, Starbuck’s Signing store is an emblem of “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
19 Comments

Smile, You're on Social Media

8/9/2018

16 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

"When it's least expected - you're elected. You're the star today. Smile! You're on Candid Camera!”  It used to be that a hidden camera TV show was the only way others might see our most embarrassing or intimate moments.  Thanks to cellphones and social media, millions can now easily watch outtakes from our lives, whether we like it or not, which is what one unsuspecting airline traveler recently experienced.

A few weeks ago, Helen (last name unknown) was settling into an Alaskan Airlines flight from New York to Dallas when another passenger, Rosey Blair, asked if she’d switch seats.  Blair wanted to sit next to her boyfriend, Houston Hardaway, who was in the row behind her.  Helen obliged, which put her in front of Blair and Hardaway, and next to an attractive stranger, who later identified himself as Euan Holden, a former professional soccer player.
 
As the plane took off, so did an apparent romance between Helen and Holden.  The unexpected seatmates’ casual conversation turned flirtatious and eventually the two were touching elbows on that ambiguous middle armrest.  When the flight landed and passengers deplaned, the two could be seen strolling through the terminal together.
 
Given 40,000+ flights in the United States each day, how do we know so much about the interaction between two ordinary air travelers?  We’re privy because Blair chronicled everything about the blossoming relationship from the row behind them.
 
Around 15 times, Blair tweeted about things she saw and overheard such as the couple discovering that they were both personal trainers and vegetarians.  Pictures and videos accompanied some of the tweets, as well as the hashtags #PrettyPlaneGirl and #PlaneBae.  In very little time, Blair’s tweets amassed 630,000 likes and 250,000 retweets, then mainstream news media began to share the touching tale.
 
Sounds like a relationship and social media success story, right?  Not quite.  Helen was unaware of Blair’s inflight antics and was very unhappy to be flung into the national media spotlight, especially after the attention led to online harassment and the need to delete her social media accounts.  Helen issued a statement through an attorney that included: “I did not ask for and do not seek attention. #PlaneBae is not a romance - it is a digital-age cautionary tale about privacy, identity, ethics and consent.”

Wow.  That’s a strong reaction, but did Blair do anything wrong?  After all, it’s legal to photograph people in public places where there is no “reasonable expectation of privacy.”  The incident occurred on a commercial airliner, apparently in coach, where hundreds of people are packed like sardines.  It’s hard to get much less private. 
 
“Reasonable expectation of privacy,” however, is subject to interpretation.  Yes, a commercial airliner is a rather pubic place, but most passengers wouldn’t expect the people behind them to be eavesdropping on them throughout an entire flight or photographing them from above and between the seats.
 
An even bigger issue involves Blair’s occupation.  According to her Twitter page, she a plus-size fashion, lifestyle, and travel blogger, which means her livelihood depends on sharing content on social media.  Gaining likes, shares, and followers is key to her success, and to have a post go viral is golden.
 
Blair’s profession matters because it reframes her motives and recontexualizes her actions.  She’s no longer just a person sharing with friends a few photos she took of strangers.  She’s an entrepreneur employing visual and verbal accounts of others to advance her business interests.  She’s a marketer using Helen and Holden, without recompense, to build her brand.  Jayson DeMers describes such situations in a 2014 Forbes article:
 
“The danger in using photos of individuals for your online marketing purposes is that your efforts could be seen as commercial. The rules when it comes to using photos for commercial purposes differ from when you’re merely sharing vacation photos with your buddies. Even if you aren’t directly making money off of the usage, a photo in a social media campaign can easily be seen as similar to using a photo in a print brochure or billboard ad.”
 
What Blair did was not clearly illegal, but her actions could easily land her on the losing end of a lawsuit, as DeMers continues to explain: “If your subject believes his likeness was used to sell a product without his permission, you may find yourself on the losing side of an argument in front of a judge.”
 
Ethics, however, is not simply a matter of ‘legal’ or ‘illegal.’  It’s about doing the right thing no matter what the law says.  In that light, a good question for Blair or anyone in a similar situation to ask is “Would I want someone else to eavesdrop on my conversation, take pictures of me without my knowledge or permission, and share those things on social media?”
 
Most of us would say, “Of course not.”  So, if that’s the kind of consideration we’d like for our own privacy, we should obey the Golden Rule and show the same respect to others.
 
Everyone makes mistakes, and Blair seems to recognize that her social media sharing of two strangers’ personal interactions was wrong.  She has offered an apology; although, she failed to delete most of her tweets about the incident.  For this reason and all of the above, Blair’s creation and promotion of “Plane bae” should be considered “Single-Minded Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
16 Comments

Churches for Men Who Don’t Like Church

7/7/2018

6 Comments

 
Picture

by Michael Zigarelli, professor of leadership and strategy at Messiah College
mzigarelli@messiah.edu


“Jake” is not his real name, but he’s a real guy experiencing real change. Jake is 37 with three kids, married for 13 years, many of them unhappy. His life and his work are  uninspiring, but it’s a living.

Gradually, his living is becoming a life, and it’s happening in the last place he’d expect: a church.

Jake’s making friends there, his first since becoming a parent. The chronic loneliness of his life—he didn’t even know how bad it was—is subsiding. There’s more peace in his household, too, probably because there’s more peace in Jake. The kids notice that dad’s different; Jake and his wife have turned back the clock 10 years. The aquifer of anger just beneath the surface has dried up.

Gone as well is Jake’s misperception of God. He’s learning that God really does love him. That’s changed everything, giving Jake a new identity—his real identity.

Now multiply Jake’s experience by a hundred thousand. Maybe more. Research I’m conducting across the United States reveals that there are countless Jakes out there because a few innovative churches have figured out how to reach them.

Why Some Churches Target Men

The concept of a “target market” is Business 101, just as the analogous concept of a “target people group” is Missions 101. It’s axiomatic. It works. From a theological perspective, it’s good stewardship.

So consider the logic of “adult men,” or some subset, being a church’s primary target. First, a scant one in five men attends religious services weekly in the United States. Second, there’s the longstanding gender gap: Sit in the back pew this Sunday and you can count 50 percent more women than men. And third, targeting men seems to accelerate church growth. Consider these strikingly-consistent perspectives from senior pastors I interviewed:
  • “It’s a very simple argument: You reach the man, you reach the family.”
  • “If the men are respected and feel comfortable in your church, the families will follow.”
  • “We stumbled into this strategy: If you get the man, you often get everyone in his circle.”
  • “We asked ‘how do we reach the most people?’ and it seemed that if we could reach the husband or the dad, then we had a good shot at reaching the rest.”

The churches in my study do not appear to be part of some masculinity movement. Rather, they’ve simply adopted an efficient and catalytic strategy: Get the man, get the family. The approach not only reaches a vast and underserved “people group,” it has the byproduct effect of bringing in women and children by the vanload.

Perhaps that’s why most of these churches have gone from start-up to thousands in weekly attendance in a mere decade or two. One, in fact, now attracts 10,000 visitors a week system-wide. Another attracts 27,000.

As a strategy professor, I can’t say I’m surprised by the growth. These churches are pursuing what’s known in my world as a “blue ocean strategy,” the disproportionately powerful decision to go where the “non-customers” are—that is, to serve an ignored segment of the market that would buy your product under the right conditions. The pastors have simply provided the right conditions, enabling their churches to claim, again, to use the business language, “uncontested market space” (i.e., the men who would not be in any church otherwise).

Hence the metaphor of operating in an undisturbed “blue ocean.” No competition there, only demand. It’s the same approach that propelled Henry Ford, Milton Hershey, Sam Walton, and Steve Jobs. Many others as well: Southwest Air, CNN, Home Depot, Airbnb, Cirque du Soleil, Starbucks, Nintendo, Netflix, Quicken—all have soared by serving those formerly on the sidelines.

My emerging sense is that there is plenty of room in that blue ocean for churches beyond those in this study. In other words, there seems to be a wide-open space for more effective evangelism and discipleship of men, and by extension, those in their sphere of influence. Let me introduce you to a few exemplars.

Seven Man-Friendly Churches

For this project, I found seven churches overflowing with men. They’re not that way by chance. Rather, they’ve been intentional, even relentless, about pursuing men as their primary “target people group.” In alphabetical order, the churches in this study are:
  • 121 Community Church, Grapevine TX, Founding Pastor Ross Sawyers
  • Christ’s Church of the Valley (CCV), Peoria AZ, Founding Pastor Don Wilson
  • Coastal Church, Daphne AL, Founding Pastor Chad Stafford
  • Mecklenburg Community Church, Charlotte NC, Founding Pastor Jim White
  • Northwood Church, Summerville SC, Founding Pastor Fred Richard
  • Revolution Church, Tucson AZ, Founding Pastor Josh Reich
  • Wheatland Salem United Methodist Church, Naperville IL, Pastor Jennifer Wilson

Each is man-friendly at its core, designed to reach the unreached. Their goals and strategies make that plain. So do these quotes from some of the senior pastors I interviewed:

“I have the Biblically-illiterate, f-bomb-dropping guy in my head with every talk I write.”

“The person we’re trying to connect with is the 20- to 40-year-old guy who comes in, probably late, sits in the back row, folds his arms and says ‘God, this is your last shot.’”

“Our target is the young dad who was in a fraternity, went to church and hated it, is now working 60 hours a week. He’s more in need of community than he’s ever been in his life; he’s so disconnected from God.”

One pastor summed it up straightforwardly for them all: “I go after guys who were raised Christian, but who haven’t been to church in a while.” Simple. Focused. The classic hedgehog technique from Good to Great.

How do they do it? Their implementation weaves its way through the music, the messages, the staffing choices, the platforming and promotions, even the colors and decor. They’ve replaced flowers and pastels with earth tones and lobby screens tuned to ESPN. They avoid love songs to Jesus and other language that makes guys feel weird. They keep the service to an hour, the messages to a half-hour, and the content intensely practical.

And they do so much more. You can find the details in this Christianity Today article or these more in-depth pieces on LinkedIn and on YouTube.

Women and Children Love These Churches, Too

While it’s possible to become a man-friendly church at the expense of others, the leaders I interviewed seem better than that, seeking win-wins. Most, for example, have gone big with children’s ministry—huge, in fact—not just to serve the kids, but because guys who won’t come to church for themselves will attend if their kids love it.

Women are also enthusiastic about these churches, according to the leadership. Ecstatic in many cases. This quote from one of the pastors echoes what I heard from several of them: “No lady has ever said we’re too masculine. But I’ve had dozens of them come to me with tears in their eyes, saying ‘I’ve been trying to get my husband to go to church for 20 years and this is the only church he will ever go to. Thank you so much!’”

While this research is ongoing, my preliminary conclusion is that these church leaders have found an approach that is working for everyone, reaching thousands who would otherwise remain alienated from God, and offering us a novel, nonprofit example of “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
6 Comments

For Lives, For Profit

5/16/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

Childbirth can be dangerous—Claudine Ndayishime found out firsthand when a C-section complication caused her to lose blood and slip into a coma.  Tragically, the hospital didn’t have her blood type in stock.  As her life hung in the balance, help came from above.
 
Flying in from many miles away, a small and very fast drone delivered the blood she desperately needed.  Thankfully, Ndayishime and her daughter are alive and doing well today.  The drone that made the life-saving delivery wasn’t from who you might expect, e.g., the hospital system or the Red Cross.  It came from Zipline, a for-profit startup company whose mission is about “life-saving delivery by drone.”
 
Ndayishime’s story of death defiance is not unique.  Since launching in Rwanda in October 2016, Zipline’s innovative approach to delivering critical medical supplies has “logged more than 186,000 miles and over 4,000 deliveries,” often for cases of critical need.  Rwanda’s Minister of Health Dr. Diane Gashumba suggests that  many lives have been saved as a result.
 
Aerial drones are increasingly common.  A simple search on Walmart.com returns over eighty drones that end-consumers can buy.  So, why are Zipline’s drones special, and how does a small start-up deliver life-saving service on a national scale?  For a clear and quick understanding of Zipline, watch the following three-minute video:  https://youtu.be/6wBeXIgD4sY
 
One big difference from other drones is that Zipline’s have fixed wings, i.e., they’re like airplanes not helicopters.  Zipline uses fixed-wing aircraft for the same reasons commercial airlines do—they can fly farther and faster.  While Amazon’s delivery drones hit top speeds of 50 mph, Zipline’s drones travel as fast as 80 mph, making its technology “the fastest commercial delivery drone on earth.”
 
In critical situations when every minute matters, that speed saves lives, as does the reach of Zipline’s drones.  The firm’s fixed-wing craft are more efficient than typical drones, allowing them to fly for nearly 100 miles round trip, or about 200 times further than the average quad-copter.  Zipline’s drones also are cable of “flying over tall mountains, and even through high winds and downpours"--something most drones could never do.
 
However, Zipline’s success stems from more than just the type of drones it uses.  The company employs comprehensive logistics that include strategically-located distribution centers for medical supplies, a text message-based ordering system, and “military-grade GPS” that guides the drone to the appropriate destination, where the valuable cargo is dropped softly by parachute.
 
Another important feature of Zipline’s drones is that they don’t take off and land like typical fixed-wing aircraft.  Instead, the “zips” fly more like jets on and off an aircraft carrier.  The drones are catapulted into flight for take-off, and they are tail-hooked out of the air upon returning to the distribution center, all of which adds to speed of service and location flexibility.
 
At this point, Zipline’s operations are restricted to Rwanda, but the company has plans to place distribution centers in many other countries around the world, including in the United States.   Zipline has raised over $41 million in capital, which will help fuel the expansion.
 
That last piece of information may make some people uncomfortable:  Zipline is a for-profit firm.  As such, the company not only needs net income, it must produce a big enough return on investment to satisfy existing investors and to encourage future ones to buy into the business model.  The average rate of return venture capitalists expect is 25%.
 
So, Zipline’s motivation is based on more than a selfless desire to do good.  If your life were on the line, would you want the outcome to rest on the wings of a for-profit company?  Wouldn’t you want aid from an organization that was more purely altruistic?
 
It would be helpful to ask these questions of Ndayishime and others in Rwanda who Zipline’s fast-moving drones have saved.  My guess is they would have no problem with a for-profit firm being in the business of saving lives.
 
It’s a fallacy to think that individuals and organizations cannot hold different motives concurrently.  Most of us do that kind of balancing in several areas of our lives.  For instance, we’re employees who want to help the people our organization serves, but we also want to get paid.  Those motives are different but complementary:  the better we serve others, the more likely it is that we'll keep our jobs and perhaps receive a raise.
 
A similar relationship exists for Zipline.  The better it serves hospitals and their patients, the more likely it is to retain their business and gain new accounts from other institutions.  In the case of Zipline and many other companies, profit serves as an added incentive to innovate and to deliver their products/services more efficiently and effectively, which benefits others.

At a time when many say that technology is taking jobs and that business is bad for society, Zipline offers an excellent example of the opposite:  Its work saves lives, provides employment, and ultimately makes our world a better place.  It’s a company that can be commended for its “Mindful Marketing.”


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
1 Comment

Does 'Amazon Go' Mean Goodbye to Jobs?

1/27/2018

73 Comments

 
Picture

by David Hagenbuch, founder of Mindful Marketing & author of Honorable Influence

Imagine walking into a store, taking whatever you want, and walking out.  What sounds like a shoplifter’s fantasy, Amazon has made a reality, of sorts, in its one-of-a-kind Seattle store.  Customers still need to pay, but the entire process is automated electronically, which may lead some to ask, ‘Is Amazon’s cashier-less concept endangering employment?’
 
It may seem strange that the king of ecommerce is bothering at all with old-school, brick-and-mortar retail, let alone a self-checkout store.  Many online retailers, however, have found that the secret to long-term success involves a combination of “bricks and clicks,” i.e., both a traditional and a virtual market presence.

Of course, this is not Amazon’s first foray into physical retail.  The company already has a handful of retail stores.  A main reason for these tangible outlets is that, as convenient as ecommerce may be, there are certain things that people want NOW, and they’re not willing to wait overnight or even a few hours, if same-day delivery happens to be possible.  In sum, Amazon doesn’t want to miss out on the market for immediacy.

With its new “Amazon Go” store the company has taken ‘fast’ a big step further by eliminating the checkout line.  Here’s how the “Just Walk Out Technology” works.  Amazon account holders download the free Amazon Go app and scan their smartphones when entering the store.  Every item they choose from store shelves, then, is automatically placed in their virtual shopping cart by means of “the same types of technologies used in self-driving cars: computer vision, sensor fusion, and deep learning.”  When customers exit the store, the system charges their Amazon accounts and sends them receipts for their purchases, all without them ever entering a checkout line.

What can people buy at this one-of-a-kind store that claims “The world’s most advanced shopping technology”?  At this point, the options are mainly grocery items, including Amazon Meal Kits.  It makes sense for Amazon Go to focus on food because edibles are what people most often want to get quickly; they certainly don’t want to wait the days or weeks it takes to receive some goods from Amazon.com. 
 
But, a cashier-less store is a potential cause for concern, for at least a few reasons.  First and foremost, it seems like the technology could be taking workers’ jobs.  People get paid to run cash registers and otherwise help check others out of stores.  Granted, Amazon isn’t a big brick-and-mortar retailer now, but that seems to be changing.  After opening its first Amazon Books store in Seattle in November 2015, the company now operates in a dozen more locations scattered throughout the U.S., with plans to open several more soon.

Even if Amazon doesn’t implement cashier-less checkout in its Books stores, or it fails to make its Go stores as ubiquitous as McDonald’s restaurants, the employment impact of the technology will still spread.  It’s likely that other retailers and technology companies are already working on their own versions of Just Walk Out Technology that one or more of them will pilot in the near future.  Then, after fixing the flaws, the technology will likely penetrate more and more retail sectors, just like self-checkout spread from grocery stores to big box retailers and beyond.

So, there’s potential that not just a few dozen, but thousands, tens of thousands, or more cashiers could be displaced.  For instance, there are over 154,000 convenience stores in the United States.  If just 10% of those stores adopted something akin to Amazon’s Just Walk Out Technology, and each store employed four cashiers, there would be over 61,000 people out of work.
 
Such projections make cashier-less shopping or any technology that replaces human labor sound bad, but is it really?  Just a century or so ago, many people were employed in basic manual tasks, like digging holes, ditches, etc.  If you’ve ever dug a hole of a significant size in solid ground, you know it’s a very strenuous task.

Thankfully, ingenious individuals invented machines like the bulldozer and backhoe that dig far more effectively than even a hoard of humans with shovels.  Did that technology take jobs away from people who could dig?  Yes.  But that displacement was ultimately for their own good, as well as the good of society.  Few people want to make a living digging holes by hand.  It’s much less strenuous and more stimulating to operate the machinery that does the digging, or to plan where the digging should be done, or to build the homes, highways, etc. that use the holes and help drive the economy.
 
Of course, being a cashier demands a broader range of skills than digging a hole; yet, most cashiers probably would welcome the opportunity to do work with more variety or challenge, maybe after receiving some additional training or education.  Regardless, we all must recognize that technological advancements have changed the way people have worked for millennia, and they will continue to do so.  What’s more, that rate of change may be increasing when one considers recent innovations in areas such as robotics, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence.
 
Someone who knows something about technology and job creation is Microsoft founder and philanthropist, Bill Gates.  The software that Gates developed decades ago and the advancements it supported, inevitably led to the displacement of workers whose job skills were passé. 
 
However, that technology also created thousands upon thousands of new and more engaging employment opportunities for individuals who learned to leverage that technology.  In an interview with Fox Business, Gates suggested that the same cycle of economic growth and job reassignment will continue in the wake of the latest applications of new tech.

Amazon Go is a ‘prime’ example of technological advance sparking job skill evolution and likely economic growth.  Although the store doesn’t have cashiers, it employs a variety of other individuals in meaningful work that includes making the retailer’s ready-to-eat food and offering customers product recommendations.  What's more, people are needed to build, install, and maintain the Just Walk Out systems.

Amazon isn’t guilty of eliminating jobs; rather it’s created new and more interesting opportunities for individuals, particularly for ones who embrace technology and invest in their own professional development.  In sum, Amazon Go checks out as “Mindful Marketing.” 


Picture
Picture
Subscribe to Mindful Matters blog.
Learn more about the Mindful Matrix and Mindful Meter.
Check out Mindful Marketing Ads
 and Vote your Mind!
73 Comments
<<Previous
    Subscribe to receive this blog by email

    Editor

    David Hagenbuch,
    founder of
    Mindful Marketing    & author of Honorable Influence

    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    + Decency
    + Fairness
    Honesty7883a9b09e
    * Mindful
    Mindless33703c5669
    > Place
    Price5d70aa2269
    > Product
    Promotion37eb4ea826
    Respect170bbeec51
    Simple Minded
    Single Minded2c3169a786
    + Stewardship

    RSS Feed

    Share this blog:

    Subscribe to
    Mindful Matters
    blog by email


    Illuminating
    ​Marketing Ethics ​

    Encouraging
    ​Ethical Marketing  ​


    Copyright 2020
    David Hagenbuch

Proudly powered by Weebly